![define materialize define materialize](https://i.materialise.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/IMG_8506-blog.jpg)
One important benchmark of admissibility is relevance. Both state and federal rules of evidence serve as a guide for judges and attorneys so that they can determine whether to admit evidence-that is, whether to allow evidence to be observed by the judge or jury making factual conclusions in a trial.
![define materialize define materialize](https://dictspace.sgp1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/worldofdictionary.com/image/english-polish/meaning/materialize.jpg)
![define materialize define materialize](https://www.belugacdn.com/images/materialize-cdn.png)
Most states now also have codified rules of evidence based on these federal rules. The Federal Rules of Evidence are the official rules in federal court proceedings. Following a lengthy campaign begun by the American Law Institute, which drafted its Model rules of evidence in 1942, and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Rules, which drafted the Uniform Rules of Evidence in 1953, Congress in 1975 adopted the Federal Rules of Evidence. Legal scholars long pushed for legislation to provide uniformity and predictability to the evidentiary issues that arise during litigation. Until 1975, the law of evidence was largely a creature of the Common Law: Evidence rules in most jurisdictions were established by cases rather than by organized, official codifications. A system of rules and standards that is used to determine which facts may be admitted, and to what extent a judge or jury may consider those facts, as proof of a particular issue in a lawsuit. Any matter of fact that a party to a lawsuit offers to prove or disprove an issue in the case.